Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Pasca Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 Studi Kasus Penetapan Nomor 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN.Jkt.Utr
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Marriage is a sacred and noble procession to build a household that is considered legitimate from a religious and state perspective. Positive law prohibits interfaith marriages as stated in SEMA No. 2 of 2023 concerning Judges' Instructions in Adjudicating Cases of Applications for Registration of Marriages Between People of Different Religions and Beliefs. However, the judge in Stipulation Number 423/PDT.P/2023/PN.Jkt.Utr granted the request for registration of interfaith marriage applications. The legal research used in this article is normative juridical, based on an internal perspective that is able to provide legal arguments when conflicts, ambiguities, or legal gaps are found. The results of the study show that the judge's considerations in Stipulation Number 423/PDT.P/2023/PN.Jkt.Utr are inappropriate in using the legal basis. The judge is of the view that Catholicism and Protestant Christianity are still within the same scope of faith so that they are in harmony. However, the judge did not refer to SEMA Number 2 of 2023 as a legal basis for deciding the case, did not consider the norm of Article 2 paragraph 1 of the Marriage Law, did not consider the rejection from the Dukcapil Office, did not consider evidence in the form of the Applicants' Identity Cards, and finally the Judge did not consider the prohibitions of each of the Applicants' religions. The Judge should have made a decision based on the correct legal basis as a consideration so that in the future there would be no more inappropriate decisions.
Keywords : Marriage; Different Religion; Judge Consideration
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Buku
Hotman P. Sibuea. Asas Negara Hukum, Peraturan Kebijakan, Jakarta: Erlangga, 2010.
Johnny Ibrahim. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing, 2008.
Tinuk Dwi Cahyani. Hukum Perkawinan. Malang: UMM Press, 2020.
B. Artikel Jurnal
Akhmad Munawar, “Sahnya Perkawinan Menurut Hukum Positif Yang Berlaku Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Al’ Adl 7, No. 13, (2023).
Anggreini Carolina Palandi, “Analisa Yuridis Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Lex Privatum 1, No.2, (2023).
Bintang Ulya Kharisma, “Jurnal Perkawinan Beda Agama” Journal of Scientech and Development 5, No. 1, (2023): 479.
Novita Lestari, “Problematika Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia”, Mizani :Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi dan Keagamaan 4, No. 1, (2022).
Sri Wahyuni, “Kontroversi Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia”, Al Risalah : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 11, No. 2, (2021).
Prasetyo Ade Witoko, dan Ambar Budhisulistyawati, “Penyelundupan Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 7, No. 2, (2019): 251-257. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i2.43015
C. Website
https://www.ksplaw.co.id/Publication/KSP-LEGAL-ALERT/ma-resmi-larang-pengadilan-izinkan-pernikahanbedaagama.html#:~:text=Berdasarkan%20Surat%20Ditjen%20Dukcapil%20Kemendagri,menundukkan%20diri%20kepada%20agama%20pasangannya yang diakses pada tanggal 18 Januari 2024
D. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun1974 tentang Perkawinan
Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2013 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan
Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 Tentang Penyebarluasan Kompilasi Hukum Islam
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 Tentang Mahkamah Agung
Undang-Undang No.13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1950 Tentang Susunan, Kekuasaan dan Jalan Pengadilan Mahkamah Agung
Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Utara Nomor 423/PDT.P/2023/PN JKT.UTR