The Existence of Marriage Agreement Registration In Legal Protection Perspective
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Failure to comply with the registration of the marriage agreement causes the agreement to be null and void because it does not fulfill one of the conditions for a valid agreement according to Article 1320 of the Civil Code and is contrary to Article 29 paragraph (1) of Law no. Therefore, this research will write about the role of registration of marriage agreements in ensuring legal certainty and protection of the rights of the parties concerned and the legal consequences of non-compliance in registering marriage agreements. The type of research used is a normative juridical method, namely research guided by positive legal regulations in accordance with the laws and regulations applicable in society. In resolving a legal issue, the author uses two approaches, namely the Statute Approach which is carried out by examining all statutory regulations relating to the legal issue to be studied, and the Conceptual Approach which carries out the interpretation. principles, laws and legal concepts according to the legal issue being studied. The legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials using the library research method of collecting legal materials (Library Research) with research analysis using deductive methods. The result is registration of a marriage agreement has permanent legal force, thereby providing optimal protection for both parties from potential disputes in the future. Failure to comply with the obligation to register a marriage agreement, even though it has been made in the form of an authentic deed by a notary, has the implication that the agreement is null and void. It is hoped that in the future the government can increase outreach and education as well as simplify the procedures for registering marriage agreements.
Keywords: Marriage Agreements; Register; Legal Protection.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Books
Prawirohamidjojo, Soetojo. 1998. Pluralisme dalam Perundang-undangan Perkawinan di Indonesia. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Wahyuningsih, Erna, & Putu Samawati. 2006. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Palembang: PT. Rambang Palembang.
B. Article Journal
Charissa, Amanda. “Peran Notaris Terkait Pengesahan Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Serta Pentingnya Pencatatan Perjanjian Perkawinan Terhadap Pihak Ketiga (Analisa Putusan No. 59/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bgr)”, Indonesian Notary 4, No. 2, (2022) : 1148-1171.
Dwinopianti, Eva. “Implikasi dan Akibat Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015 terhadap Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Kawin yang Dibuat di Hadapan Notaris”. Lex Renaissance 2, No.1, (2017) : 17.
Dwiyandi, Ricky, et.al.. “Status Hukum Harta Bersama Akibat Putusnya Perkawinan Karena Perceraian”, Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan 6, No. 2, (2017): 175. 170-179
Farida, Nadhira Zahra, et.Al. “Akibat Hukum Perceraian Terhadap Harta Bersama Pada Pasangan Tanpa Perjanjian Perkawinan Dan Istri Yang Menjalankan Kewajiban Suami Dalam Mencari Nafkah Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Perkawinan Dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam” Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial 3, No.4, (2024): 168. 155-173
Kenedi, John. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama dengan Harta Bawaan Ketika Terjadi Perceraian,”Manhaj: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat 3, No.1, (2018) : 92-106.
Melia, et.al., “Pembagian Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian (Studiterhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agungnomor 597k/Ag/2016)”, Jurnal Ius Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 7, No. 3, (2017): 506-518.
Nagara, Bernadus. “Pembagian Harta Gono-Gini Atau Harta Bersama Setelah Perceraian Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974” Lex Crimen 5, No. 7, (2016) : 51-57.
Ngadimah, Mambaul. et.al., “Formulasi Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan MK No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Kodifikasia 11, No. 1, (2017): 157-180. https://doi.org/10.21154/kodifikasia.v11i1.1139
Pawitasari, Aldilla Gemiyu. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebagai Instrumen Perlindungan Hukum Dalam Perkawinan Poligami Di Indonesia”, Lex Renaissance 4, No. 2, (2019) : 338-353.
Ramadhan, Muhammad Akbar Aulia, et.al.. “Perjanjian Perkawinan Terhadap Harta Yang Diperoleh Selama Perkawinan Pasca Perceraian”, Repertorium : Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 6, No. 2, (2017): 157-158.
Rivanda, Fira Adhisa, & Gemala Dewi, “Akibat Hukum Akta Perjanjian Perkawinan Yang Tidak Dicatatkan Dalam Perkawinan Campuran”, Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu: Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan 13, No.1, (2022) : 81-90. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v13i1.20218
Tamengkel, Filma. “Dampak Yuridis Perjanjian Pra Nikah (Prenuptial Agreement) Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan”, Lex Privatum 3, No. 1, (2015) : 199-210.
Werdiningsih, “Asas Publisitas Perjanjian Perkawinan (Post Nuptial Agreement): konsep kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi pihak ketiga”, Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan 4, No. 1, (2023) : 45-64. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i1.38537
Yuvens, Damian Agata. “Analisis Kritis terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015”, Jurnal Konstitusi 14, No. 4, (2018) : 800-819. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1445
Zahara, Delia astrid, & Antarin Prasanthi Sigit. “Implikasi Yuridis Perjanjian Perkawinan yang Didaftarkan Pada Saat proses Perceraian”, UNES Law Review 6, No. 2, (2023): 4870-4890. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1311
C. Statutory Regulations
Civil Code
Law No. 1 Of 1974 Concerning Marriage
Law No. 2 Of 2014 Concerning The Position Of Notaries
Constitutional Court Decision No. 69/Puu-Xiii/2015 Considers The Purpose Of A Marriage Agreement