Arrangement of Agrarian Reform as A Basis For Providing Legal Certainty For the Community
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The existence of government policies that have been issued regarding the implementation of the agrarian reform program but still give rise to imbalances in the structure of control, ownership, use, and utilization of land. Until now, it seems as if the implementation of the agrarian reform program is running in place, even though in order to make the agrarian reform a success, the government has tried to create regulations that are used as a legal basis so that the agrarian reform can run according to its objectives. This study aims to examine the legal certainty of agrarian reform asset management policies. This study is a normative study that uses a statutory regulatory approach and a conceptual approach. The statutory approach is a study of legal products. The results of the study show that 1). The nature of the arrangement of Agrarian Reform assets that are certain: Agrarian reform fundamentally provides programs that can resolve the problem of rural community poverty, increase welfare with national food independence, increase land productivity, provide recognition of land rights owned both privately, state, and public land whose use is to meet the interests of the community. 2). Implementation of land redistribution in Agrarian Reform: There are three forms of agrarian reform, namely asset legalization, land redistribution and social forestry. Model of equitable agrarian reform: Agrarian reform or equitable agrarian renewal is something that is complex and multidimensional which is a major program of the Indonesian state in realizing the welfare of the Indonesian people, especially in terms of increasing access for poor farmers to land control in Indonesia, but implementing equitable agrarian reform is not an easy thing, there are many obstacles, both in terms of legal aspects, land administration, social, political, cultural, and security.
Keywords: Asset Management Policy, Agrarian Reform, Legal Certainty for the Community
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
A. Book
Amran, Suadi. 2020. Filsafat Keadilan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Hidayat, Hanu Nur. 2023. Optimalisasi Penanganan Akses Reforma Agraria Melalui Integrasi Data Penataan Asset Dan Penataan Akses (Indrapas) Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Halmahera Timur. Jakarta: Laporan Implementasi Aksi Perubahan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik.
Hutagalung, Arie Sukanti. 1985. Program Redistribusi Tanah di Indonesia, Suara Kearah Pemecahan Masalah Penguasaan Tanah dan Pemilikan Tanah. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Limbong, Bernhard. 2011. Hukum Agraria Nasional. Jakarta: Pustaka Margatetha.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2020. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Salim, Muhammad Nazir. 2020. Reforma Agraria: Kelembagaan dan Praktik Kebijakan. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
----------------. & Westi Utami. 2020. Reforma Agraria, Menyelesaikan Mandat Konstitusi: Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Dan Perdebatan Tanah Objek Reforma Agraria. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
Shohibuddin & Muhammad Nazir Salim. 2012. Pembentukan Kebijakan Reforma Agraria 2006-2007 Bunga Rampai Perdebatan. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
Sidharta, Bernard Arief. 2003. Meuwissen tentang Pengembangan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum dan Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sumardjono, Maria S.W. 2008. Tanah dalam Perspektif Hak Ekonomi, Sosial, dan Budaya. Jakarta: Kompas.
Sutaryono, S. et.al. 2019. Penataan Kelembagan Dalam Pelaksanaan Reforma Agraria Di Kabupaten Sanggau Kalimantan Barat. Yogyakarta: STPN Press.
B. Article Journal
Aida, Ade Nurul. “Redistribusi Lahan Di Indonesia Untuk Kesejahteraan Petani”, Buletin APBN 2. No. 6. (2017):3-13.
Alfonsa. Dian Aries Mujiburohman. & Sutaryono. “Penerbitan Dan Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Karena Cacat Administrasi”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, No. 2, (2021): 277–288. https://jih.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/JIH/article/view/8095
Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham. “Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance Dalam Penyelenggaraan Reforma Agraria Di Indonesia”. Jurnal Yuridika 28. No. 2. (2013):432-450. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i2.1881.
Bachriadi, Dianto. “Reforma Agraria untuk Indonesia: Pandangan Kritis tentang Program Pembaharuan Agraria Nasional (PPAN) atau Redistribusi Tanah ala Pemerintahan SBY”. Jurnal Ilmiah Reforma Agraria Untuk Indonesia 1. No. 1. (2007):20-45.
Chadijah, Siti. Dwi Kusumo Wardhani. & Ali Imron. “Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Terhadap Lahan Pertanian Di Kabupaten Tulungagung”, Jurnal Cendekia Hukum 6, No. 1, (2022): 91–103. http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v6i1.286
Earlene, Felishella. & Benny Djaja. “Implikasi kebijakan reforma agraria terhadap ketidaksetaraan kepemilikan tanah melalui lensa hak asasi manusia”. Jurnal Tunas Agraria 6. No. 2. (2023):152-170. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v6i2.223
Fauzi, Ahmad. “Reformasi Agraria Dalam Kerangka Otonomi Daerah”. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 6. No. 2. (2022):218–233. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i2.678
Hastiyanto, Febrie. “Perencanaan Pembangunan dan Gerakan Sosial Dalam Reforma Agraria di Indonesia”, Kybernan: Jurnal Studi Kepemerintahan 4, No. 2, (2019): 56-76. https://doi.org/10.35326/kybernan.v5i2.369
Luthfi, A.N. “Reforma Kelembagaan Dalam Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Era Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla”. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan 4. No. 2. (2019): 140–163. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i2.276
Mujiburohman, Dian Aries. “Potensi Permasalahan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik Lengkap (PTSL)”. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 4. No. 1. (2018): 88–101. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v4i1.217
Nurhayati, Siti. Onny Medaline. & Ayumi Kartika Sari. “Penataan Aset Dan Akses Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Melalui Pendaftaran Lahan Sistemik Lengkap”, Jurnal Rectum 4, No. 1, (2022):282-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i2.1882
Rejekiningsih, Triana. “Asas Fungsi Sosial Hak Atas Tanah Pada Negara Hukum (Suatu Tinjauan dari Teori, Yuridis dan Penerapannya di Indonesia”. Jurnal Yustisia 5. No. 2. (2016):1-28. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i2.8744
Resti, Farah Ananda. & Harvini Wulansari. “Peran Gugus Tugas Reforma Agraria Mewujudkan Kampung Reforma Agraria”, Tunas Agraria 5. No. 2. (2022): 67-80. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v5i2.178
Rohman, Muhammad Luthfi. & Puji Astuti. “Access Reform Dalam Program Reforma Agraria: Studi Kasus Desa Tahunan Kecamatan Tahunan Kabupaten Jepara”, Journal of Politic and Government Studies 8. No. 4. (2019):120-131. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/jpgs/article/view/25067
Saputro, Agus Haryono. Fokky Fuad. & Suartini. “Third Party Legal Protection as a Good Intention Buyer of Land Which is Indicated Abandoned”, Unes Law Review 5, No. 4, (2023): 4014-4030. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.709
Sari, Ni Luh Ariningsih. & I Wayan Suwanda. “Kebijakan Di Era Pemerintahan Joko Widodo Dan Jusuf Kalla (Perspektif Politik Hukum Dan Agraria)”. Jurnal Ganec Swara 13. No. 2. (2019): 237–243. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v13i2.87
Sihaloho, Martua. et.al., Reforma Agraria Dan Revitalisasi Pertanian Di Indonesia: Studi Kasus Pertanian Tanaman Pangan dan Hortikultura di Jawa Barat, Sodality: Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, dan Ekologi Manusia, Vol. 4 No. 1 (2010):149-165. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v4i1.5849
Sizi, Baiq Rara Charina. Usman Munir. & Imawanto. “Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Yang Berkeadilan”, Unizar Law Review 6, No. 2, (2023): 210-216. https://ulr.unizar.ac.id/ulr/article/view/57
Sutadi, Rayyan Dimas. et.al. “Kebijakan Reforma Agraria di Indonesia (Kajian Komparatif Tiga Periode Pelaksanaan: Orde Lama Orde Baru, dan Orde Reformasi)”, Tunas Agraria 1, No. 1, (2018):46-60. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v1i1.11
Widiyanto, “Potret Konflik Agraria Di Indonesia”, BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan 1, No. 37, (2013): 67-79. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v0i37.149
C. Statutory Regulations
Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Regulations
Presidential Regulation Number 62 of 2023 concerning the Acceleration of the Implementation of Agrarian Reform